And I've been trying to think about the Word and the Supper. The Supper is of course "things" more obviously than the Word is a "thing", though of course the word is mediated to us by the physical and there are lots of books and ink and pages about.
Anyway, some of that stuff flooded into my mind when I read this interesting snippet on Pastor Douglas Wilson's blog:
The Reformers not only revered their biblical heritage, but recovered its energies, its acids, its spices, its 'red wine and cheese', the sting and zing of the Magnificat. We should therefore be chary of assuming that a more verbal spirituality, which Protestantism undoubtedly was, was necessarily more bookish or intellectual. It commuted between the lofty discourse of the classics and the rude simplicities of the venacular. The living Word which Luther talking about, emerged from a filthy stable and ended on a foul cross. Theology was worked out in the study, certainly, but above all in living, dying, being damned" Theologia crucis"
(Matheson, The Imaginative World of the Reformation, p. 127).
And this (via the same source) was wonderful:
I wish we did not have to fritter away on frivolous things, like lectures and literature, the time we might have given to serious, solid and constructive work like cutting out cardboard figures and pasting coloured tinsel upon themEvangelicals undoubtedly have much more thinking to do about words and things, culture and creation. I'm going to start with Revd Dr David P Field 'Not The Least Lash Lost' (linked to from his blog, linked to on the right) about how nothing we ever do is lost and all creation is transformed into the New Creation, hence the added importance of daily acts of service (the dishes) and culture building (writing symphonies and painting portraits).
(G.K. Chesterton as quoted in Thomas Peters, The Christian Imagination, p. 10).
No comments:
Post a Comment