Interestingly, the Common Worship lectionary for this evening appoints Song of Songs 3:2-5 and John 20:11-18.
In addition, Mary finds Jesus in a spice filled garden.
As a woman searches for the man she loves in a garden perfumed with spices, we might think of the Song of Songs with the beloved seeking her lover, that picture of the relationship between the Lord and his people, Christ and the church.
I've just finished reading Sam Allberry's book on the resurrection, Lifted! (IVP), which was out this January. I must say I've thoroughly enjoyed it. It's been a very busy week with the Passion For Life Mission and at times I've been whacked out, but I've come back to Lifted! with enthusiasm and gone away encouraged.
Sam has a very lively engaging style. The book is packed with striking expressions, illustrations and anicdotes. Yet there is real theological substance here too.
In a way, the book is a series of mini-expositions and I would have liked a Scripture index so that I could more easily steal the headings!
The resurrection was at the heart of the apostolic preaching and it is often neglected today, sometimes from a wrong-headed desire to keep the cross central, when of course the cross and the resurrection belong together. One necessitates and explains the other. They are not rivals.
The biblical message of this book has the potential to be profoundly life changing. It is worth reflecting on the resurrection as God's affirmation of the physical and bodily, when Christianity is always in danger of being perverted into gnosticism. Or think of Jesus' resurrection body as the pattern both for our resurrection and what we might call the resurrection of the cosmos. This world will be transformed and renewed as Jesus' body was, so all that we do in this world matters.
Here are my jottings from the book:
The resurrection is more than the happy ending of the Easter Story
It’s not just the big tick after the big cross
“The resurrection changes everything. It guarantees our forgiveness, empowers us to change, and gives us a hope for the future and an urgent mission in
the present.”
(1) Assurance
The resurrection shows that Jesus’ payment for the sin of the world has been accepted by the Father.
The payment has been received with thanks.
The resurrection assures us that Jesus was who he claimed to be.
Acts 3:15
The resurrection “reveals and confirms his [Jesus’] four-fold identity: the Son of God, the Christ, the Saviour and the Author of life. The resurrection shows Jesus was exactly who he claimed to be.”
(a) Son of God
Ps 2:7
Rm 1:4
(b) The Christ
Acts 2:36 quoting Ps 110:1
(c) Saviour
Acts 5:30-31
(d) the author of life
Acts 3:15
Jn 11:25
The resurrection assures us of what Jesus has done
Rm 4:25
1 Cor 15:17
“the resurrection is the consequence and demonstration of our salvation because death is the consequence and demonstration of our sin.”
Death as the wages of sin Gen ; Rm 6:23
(2) Transformation
United with Christ
Spiritually raised now (Col 3:1), physically raised at Final Day (Rm 8:23)
Rm 4:17
God gives life & new life
1 Sam 2:6
Ez 37
Ps 16:10
Phil 2
God gives us resurrection life. “With it we enjoy a whole host of newness: new life, new perspective, new conduct, new power and new ambition. Resurrection life changes everything.”
New life
Eph 2:1-10
New perspective
Col 3:1-4
New conduct
Eph 5:8, 11-14
Colossians 3:5, 8–10
Acts 4:32–35
New power
Romans 8:9–11
Romans 6:5–14
New ambition
Phil 3:10-11
(3) Hope
Not wishful thinking / uncertain
Rm 5:5
1 Pt 1:3
Mistake 1: The mistake that the resurrection has already taken place (2 Tim 2:17-18)
(a) Wrong to think: We have it all now
Perfectionism, prosperity, health, wealth – believe it and receive it, name it and claim it – if you don’t the problem is your lack of faith
(b) Wrong to think: This is all there is
Mistake 2: There is no resurrection of the dead (1 Cor 15:12)
1 Cor 15:14-19
Jesus is the first of many
“It is clear, then, that the basis of our hope as Christians is the resurrection of Jesus. As we look back at the basis of our hope, we are then able to look forward to what is the content of our hope: bodily resurrection in the future.”
Rm 8:11
Look at nature nature:
(i) put death in, get life out
1 Cor 15:36
(ii) what you get out wasn’t what you put in
1 Cor 15:37-38
(iii) God is, of course, able to give things the appropriate kinds of bodies
1 Cor 15:39-41
Look at the risen Jesus
1 Corinthians 15:49
Philippians 3:21
Continuity & discontinuity with Jesus pre-resurection body
1 Corinthians 15:42–44
Perishable, dishonourable, weak, natural bodies will be transformed
Resurrection hope for creation
Frustration & Promise
Rm 8:19-22
Discontinuity
Rev 21:1, 5
Isaiah 65:17
Isaiah 11:6–9
Continuity
“God says, ‘I will make all things new’, not ‘I will make all new things’.”
I'm reading and so far very much enjoying Sam Allbery's book on the significance of the resurrection, Lifted! experiencing the resurrection life (IVP, 2010). I plan to plagarise it on Sunday evening.
Sam has a lively sense of humour and an engaging turn of phrase.
I liked this on the beggar in Acts 3:
But on this day he didn’t get change, but changed. He asked Peter for alms but received legs!
In the film Shrek, Princess Fiona kisses Shrek on their wedding day and is transformed into a troll, just like him. She is given a new life and a new relationship - and made like Shrek.
Similarly, the Christian believer is given new life and a new relationship at his regeneration and resurrection and is made like the Lord Jesus.
Some quotes plundered from the interweb on the evidence for the resurrection:
Thomas Arnold, headmaster of Rugby school and Regius Professor of Modern History at
OxfordUniversity, wrote: "I have been used for many years to study the history of other times, and to examine and weigh the evidence of those who have written about them; and
I know of no fact in the history of people which is proved by better and fuller
evidence… to the understanding of a fair inquirer, than the great sign that God has
given us, that Christ died and rose from the dead." (quoted in Michael Green, The Day Death Died, IVP, Leicester, 1987, p.15)
In the 1930s a journalist, Frank Morison, was convinced that miracles did not
happen though he admired the character of Jesus, and set out to write a book disproving the resurrection. When he studied the evidence, he wrote his book: "Who Moved the Stone?" and with great honesty entitled the first chapter: "The Book that Refused to be Written." (Michael Green, Man Alive, IVF, London, 1967, pp.54-55)
Lord Darling, formerly Lord Chief Justice of England, wrote: "The crux of the
problem of whether Jesus was or was not what he proclaimed Himself to be, must
surely depend on the truth or otherwise of the resurrection. On that greatest point
we are not merely asked to have faith. In its favour as a living truth there exists such
overwhelming evidence, positive and negative, factual and circumstantial, that no
intelligent jury in the world could fail to bring in the verdict that the resurrection
story is true." (quoted in Michael Green, The Day Death Died, IVP, Leicester, 1987, p.15)
Sir Edward Clarke, a High Court Judge, said: "As a lawyer I have made a prolonged
study of the evidence for the events of Easter Day. To me the evidence is conclusive,
and over and over again in the High Court I have secured the verdict on evidence
not nearly so compelling. As a lawyer I accept the Gospel evidence unreservedly as
the testimony of truthful people to facts that they were able to substantiate."
Bishop Westcott, one of England's greatest New Testament scholars, said: "It is not too much to say that there is no single historical incident better or more
variously attested than the resurrection of Christ." (quoted in Michael Green, The Day Death Died, IVP, Leicester, 1987, p37)
In his 800 page The Resurrection of the Son of God (London, SPCK, 2003), N. T. Wright concludes that for the New Testament writers, the resurrection of the Son of God means that he is the Messiah, the Lord of the World and God the Son.
(1) Messiah
“The first level of a ‘son of god’ understanding of Jesus’ resurrection can therefore be summarized as follows. Jesus is Israel’s Messiah. In him, the creator’s covenant plan, to deal with sin and death that has so radically infected his world, has reached its long-awaited and decisive fulfilment.” (p728)
(2) Lord
“This then is the second level of meaning. The resurrection constitutes Jesus as the world’s true sovereign, the ‘son of god’ who claims absolute allegiance from everyone and everything within creation. He is the start of the creator’s new world: its pilot project, indeed its pilot.” (p731)
(3) God
“… the fact that this Jesus had been raised by this god… drew from the early Christians the breathtaking belief that Jesus was the ‘son of god’, the unique ‘Son’ of this God, as opposed to any other… … he was the personal embodiment and revelation of the one true god.” (p731)
“The resurrection … declares that Jesus really is God’s Son… in the sense that he is the one in whom the living God, Israel’s God, has become personally present in the world, has become one of the human creatures that were made from the beginning in the image of the same God.” (p733)
“… this resurrection [of this ‘son of God’] … was the public announcement, by the one true God, that this Jesus really was, and had always been, his son in this full, self-revealing, self-embodying sense.” (p734)
I trust all my readers read, mark, learn and inwardly digest Revd Dr Peter Leithart's blog, so you already will have seen this one-liner from Rosenstock-Huessy, but I wanted to remember it:
If the tomb of Jesus is not the womb of the Christian era, we had better forget his whole story as a fairy tale.
I am a Bible believing Christian, husband to Mrs Lloyd, father to four children.
I am the Rector of Warbleton, Bodle Street Green & Dallington and Rural Dean of Dallington, Diocese of Chichester. I also edit the book reviews for The Global Anglican.