Thursday, January 18, 2007

RP

That's the Regulative Principle (of Public Worship), not recieved pronunciation.

If anybody knows the first English use of the phrase in this way (or a foreign language equivalent) by the way, I'd love to know. The great Miss Wendy Bell, the college librarian, Revd Michael Del Rio MTh and the ABTABL emailers and I tried to find out once but didn't get very far.

There's been some discussion of RP on Daniel Newman's blog but as the trail is quite old, here are some expanded thoughts:

Reading John Frame on the Regulative Principle of Public Worship seems pretty essantial to me.

http://www.reformed.org/misc/index.html?mainframe=/misc/frame_regulative_principle.html

So properly understood we're saying that the regluative principle of the whole of life is valid and bibliacal though the reformed scholastics may have erred by (1) applying it in a special narrow sense to public worship and not to other things (e.g how we dress and what we eat) and (2) treating what the Bible taught too narrowly (e.g. not taking into account what the Old Testament tells us about public worship and God's love of special feast days, neglecting examples and images in favour only of explicit NT commands).

Also, the Westminster Confession and Directory are useful on all this, aren't they, in suggesting a kind of distinction about accidence (e.g. what time on Sunday morning we meet) and essence (we must meet on the Lord's Day morning, ideally early). I forget if those are their terms. The church has authority to make semi-binding rules for a time on the accidents but not to change the essence (e.g. she can't abolish Bible reading or sermons in favour of meditation on poetry but she can say that people who read the Bible in oublic must not wear shorts).

Frame has a further distinction between elements (e.g Bible reading and singing) and mode (e.g. how loud and what instruments) which all helps.

2 comments:

Daniel Newman said...

Thanks for this, Marc.

Since, as you say, the trail has dried up on my 'blog, I'll add further comments here.

I'm reading through Deuteronomy at the moment and 4.2 says this:

"You shall not add to the word that I command you, nor take from it, that you may kep the commandments of the LORD your God that I command you."

That isn't just for public worship - that's whole-life worship in the land.

I take it we can apply this to Christian living. These are commandments given to an already redeemed people, the covenant community.

Israel failed to keep the commandments and so perished and were exiled. They did not enjoy the continuing life that v. 1 promises. Jesus is the one who perfectly kept the commandments and wholeheartedly obeyed God, who fulfilled what Israel was meant to be. Through faith alone in him alone, this promise of "life in the land" (=> life in the New Creation?) is ours. But as those who are in Christ, this still surely applies to us as redeemed people, living in covenant with God - we have to live up to the status we now have in Christ.

Marc Lloyd said...

Yep, seems right to me.