Revd Prof John Frame has pointed out the danger and weakness for criticising someone or something for their emphasis.
To do so assumes that the author has claimed to be comprehensive or definitive, or that we know the whole.
There can be many reasons for an emphasis arising from speakers or hearers (needs, interests, aptitudes, temperament, times).
For example, an Old Testament scholar who rights three 800 page books on Obadiah may not be overemphasising it. A preacher who only ever preached from Obadiah to his regular congregation would be.
Far better to take each point on its own and say why it is wrong if we want to criticise something.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Interesting comment, which contrasts a bit with Carson's comments about the Federal Vision.
Do you have a source for the comments?
Thanks, Samuel. Yes, good point. I am away from my study but I believe it is from an Appendix in The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (Theol of Lordship series, P&R), 'How to write a theological paper' - paraphrased
Can anyone confirm?
Post a Comment