The so-called Hind Report into ministry training in the Church of England championed the overall concept on Ministerial Formation which has 3 components:
(1) spirituality and character
(2) theological knowledge
(3) ministerial competence
Each of these 3 is an aspect of ministerial formation and they are not quite 3 "parts" of it. They are related and there must be integrity between the 3.
Categories such as insperable operation and mutual indwelling may help to articulate this.
Each of the 3 aspects must be distinguished but not separated.
They may also be perspectivally related. (2) theological knowledge may be the normative perspective. (3) ministerial competence may be the situational perspective. (1) spirituality and character may be the existential perspective.
We may relate theological knowledge (2) to God the Father, the one known and revealed, the covenant Lord. We may relate spirituality and knowledge to Christ, the Word incarnate and made flesh, lived-out, our example and prototype. The Spirit may put this into action in the world (3).
Each component is "equal" and indispensible. There is a case for starting with Christ / charcter / spirituality / disposition / being before doing or even knowing. But arguably, the components would be best re-orderd so that theological knowledge (which is more than theoretical knowledge) takes a kind of prioroty. Who we are and what we do arises out of who God is.
Or maybe something like some of that!?
Wednesday, April 09, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment