Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Science has disproved Christianity
To say that science has disproved Christianity is a bit like saying cookery has disproved roast dinners. Science is a method. Christianity is one of the possible outcomes to which science helps to direct us, if used rightly. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. And Christianity (or roast dinners) may need to be understood and assessed by rather different methods from science (or cookery technique). Taste and see that the LORD is Good.
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Towards a humbler science
Although its not cheap and I fear I may not agree nor find it entirely inteligible, this might be an important new book for Dawkins et. al. to get their heads around. It also might have some important things to say about the difficulty of proving causation. Discussion of it on Radio 4's Thinking Aloud made me wonder to what extent causes might (just) be thought of as God's habits or the way he likes to do things, as a rule, though I don't know what the authors would make of that idea as compared to convetional scientific orthodoxies, which they regard as unproven and perhaps unprovable. One of the authors described himself as agnostic but he said that he thought it was absurd to claim that science somehow ruled out faith.
Thursday, May 06, 2010
Evolution Song
Human uniqueness, value and significance: you've got thumbs! Enjoy this song from Doug Wilson.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Science & Faith
I'm thinking I might tune in to Rev Prof Alistair McGrath's Radio 4 lent talk on the relationship between natural science, faith and religion tonight at 20:45. Although I'm sure it wont be a patch on this!
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Multiverse
On the Sunday programme on Radio 4 this morning Professor Bernard Carr argued that some people would say that "the theory of a multiverse is the last refuge of desperate atheists".
Our universe appears to be fine-tuned for (human) life, which implies a creator.
But if you imagine a huge number of universes, you can explain this universe by blind chance and so you don't need God.
Desperate indeed. In our universe there appears to be a God. In other universes, a God may not be necessary. Mmmm.
Our universe appears to be fine-tuned for (human) life, which implies a creator.
But if you imagine a huge number of universes, you can explain this universe by blind chance and so you don't need God.
Desperate indeed. In our universe there appears to be a God. In other universes, a God may not be necessary. Mmmm.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)