Covenant: The New Politics of Home, Neighbourhood and Nation
Danny Kruger
Forum / Swift Press, 2023
(ISBN: 9781800752115 hb, 149pp)
Danny Kruger, a Conservative
MP with an Oxford DPhil in history, seeks to set out a social and political
vision oriented towards The Good Life and virtuous living. He claims our
culture seems to be searching for something. “We want a life that is both embodied
and enchanted: rooted, tactile, sweaty, but also lit by sacred fire. We want a
life of function (to be useful and fully used) and of place (to identify with a
piece of land and the people of it), and for these things to be food for the
body and food for the soul.” (p82)
We need to value not only
care and fairness but recapture a sense of authority, loyalty and sanctity
(p60). Kruger wants to restore and further what he calls “The Order” which is social
and other people oriented with a network of relationships, obligations and
commitments fostered by institutions. He contrasts this with “The Idea”, the gnostic
sense that my own autonomy is all, that I should discover or define my identity
according to what I feel to be my inner self, regardless of physical or
external realities. Kruger thinks the word “woke” is rather trivial. “Cultural Marxism”
is preferable: revolutionary tribes war over identity, self-interest and
ideology rather than merely over the means of production. He prefers the term “transgressive”
to describe those who in a spirit of grievance want to overthrow all that might
restrain “the dominant individual will” (p39).
Kruger thinks “we are born
to worship: this is our essence, as primary as our existence.” (p40) He
contends that “the culture war… is a religious conflict about the right gods to
worship.” (p25) “You are what you worship. Your identity is a reflection of
your god, the thing you venerate, which gives life meaning and explains good and
evil. A culture is the act of common worship, and so a community or a civilisation
might best be defined in terms of the gods the people serve.” (p29) In our post-Christian
age, “we worship ourselves… more particularly the individual person, and even
more particularly the person within: ‘the real me.’” (p30)
Kruger argues not just for
contracts but for the covenant of marriage as the basis for a flourishing
society, and for a covenant of place and nation. He even claims that “all
politics might be said to come down to the regulation of sex and death.” (p62).
The family and household are central to him. “We cannot carry on as if the purpose
of life is the restless quest. The alteration we need is the one that a single
person, hitherto alone and self-focused, undergoes on falling in love, getting
married and starting a family. We need to move from a one-bed flat to a family
home.” The general economy should make “it as easy as possible to form and
sustain a household.” (p87) Though some may not choose or fit this pattern, the
generalisation is for the good of the wider community, not only the oikos
but the par-oikos or parish which would support others too. He wants to
see parents central to education and more local socially responsible decision making
with everyone politically engaged.
Kruger takes in not only
civil society, but our relationship to the natural environment. Paganisms
tended to see humanity as subject to nature but we should see ourselves as
stewards of creation, intended to have dominion rather than domination,
cultivation rather than exploitation.
As well as Edmund Burke,
Roger Scruton, Jonathan Haidt, Jonathan Sumption and others, Kruger cites Carl
Trueman, Colin Gunton, John Milbank, Andrew Rumsey, Alasdair MacIntyre and Tom
Holland’s Dominion. He is influenced by David Godhart’s work on “Somewhere”s
and argues that too many people uproot to go to university and join a precariat.
We are certainly given a
big vision with bold brushstrokes here. I sometimes wondered how this might be
achieved. But Kruger does have specific policy proposals for example around
planning and Community Land Trusts, law, education, social care and welfare
insurance. He wants to see work which is local and meaningful, likely focused
around creativity or care. We should value more the support families can give
to their own children and their elderly relatives rather than depending entirely
on the nursery or the care home. This involves a taxation system that supports
the household with more people able to manage on one wage or two part-time
wages. Well paid local jobs and technology would allow more time for
involvement in civil society and volunteering.
Whilst recognising that “there
is little to boast of in many aspects of modern England, and much to learn from
others” (p142), Kruger hopes for a sense of Englishness that can recapture
something of her discordant heroic, gentle, progressive, conservative spirit in
“the great project of defence and restoration that is needed.” (p144)
No comments:
Post a Comment