The controversy about asylum
seekers claiming to be Christians is fascinating in a number of ways.
(Readers might also recall
a relevant West Wing episode!)
On why one might claim
to be a Christian
The pendulum has swung on
this throughout church history. From persecuted and misunderstood minority,
Constantine took Christianity mainstream. A profession may be advantageous. For
some roles it was required. But the long death of Christianity has seen the
social cache of the church decline. Observant nominalism is probably pretty
rare these days, perhaps except among the elderly. Nowadays, bible believing
Christians might again be seen as weird, foolish or even bad. So the asylum seeker
may have unusual and particular motives.
On what is a Christian
And how one might be
recognised. And who is to judge?
By their fruits shall ye
know them. But is this really a matter for the courts?
Normally, we would expect
a certain amount of knowledge, of intellectual commitment, of heartfelt trust,
of changed life.
1 John might give tests of
doctrine, conduct and love.
A Christian is one who
trusts in Jesus and Lord and Saviour. But so many are unclear on this.
How many professing
Christians would pass these tests with flying colours?
As the old poster put it, “If
you were arrested for being a Christian, would there be enough evidence to
convict?”
We can easily try to apply
faulty criteria. It is tempting to give asylum seekers a quiz on the names of
the Apostles or the books of the New Testament, but this tells us little about
the heart of the matter, which is a matter of the heart.
On baptism policy
In the C of E, anyone
living in the parish has a right to be baptised after suitable preparation and
other things being equal. It is ultimately for the candidate to make the
promises and declarations and for the priest to exhort them to do so
thoughtfully and sincerely. There is no theology exam.
It now seems that some
sections of the press would like the clergy to make jolly sure that asylum seekers
pass the ten-week Christianity Explored course with flying colours and serve on
the coffee rota for a few months. I wonder if they feel the same when their
grandchild is up for baptism in the pretty parish church.
On the relationship
between state and church
The C of E has rightly
pointed out that it is not its job to police asylum claims.
The church can too easily
be claimed to be the reactionary traditional conservative Tory Party at prayer
and to have been captured by Guardian reading prelates. Whilst being responsible
citizens, the church must absolutely live by the standards and values of a
different Kingdom.
No comments:
Post a Comment