Hans Boersma, Scripture as Real
Presence: Sacramental Exegesis in the Early Church (Baker Academic, Grand
Rapids, 2017)
I thought I might just share a few bits:
“a reading of Scripture as Scripture, that is to say, as the
book of that church that is meant as a sacramental guide on the journey of
salvation” (p.xii)
“the overall argument of the book,
namely, that the church fathers were deeply invested in reading the Old
Testament Scriptures as a sacrament, whose historical basis or surface level
participates in the mystery of the New Testament reality of the Christ event.
The underlying message of my argument is that this sacramental approach to
reading the Scriptures is of timeless import and that it is worthy of retrieval
today.” (p.xiii)
The chapter headings hospitable
reading, harmonious reading etc. “In each case, I attempt to show that the kind
of reading discussed in that chapter is sacramental in nature. In other words,
I attempt to show how it is that the hospitable reading, harmonious reading,
and so on, all give some indication of what it means for biblical reading to be
sacramental in character.” (p.xiii)
Henri de Lubac: “The entire New
Testament is a great mystery hidden within this sacrament, or signifies by
means of this sacrament which is the Old Testament.” De Lubac, Medieval
Exegesis, 22. See also Boersma, Novelle Thelogie, 149-90. (p.xiii)
“The weakness of historical
exegesis, however, is that it doesn’t treat the Old Testament as a sacrament (sacramentum) that already contains the New Testament reality (res) of Christ.” (p.xv)
The real presence of Christ in the
OT (p.xv)
“While in some way believers today may be separated from
the Old Testament by several millennia, they are also actually present in the
hidden dimension of the Old Testament. If Christ is genuinely present in the
Old Testament, then believers – who are “in Christ” – are as well. Because
believers are “in Christ”, when they locate his real presence in the Old
Testament, they also find their own lives and realities reflected there.” (p.xv)
Chapter 1.
Patristic Reading: The Church Fathers on Sacramental Reading of Scripture
(p1ff)
Scripture as Sacrament
Main argument that the church fathers saw the Scriptures
as sacramental and read them accordingly (p1)
“I have long been convinced that the notion of sacrament
should not be limited to the ecclesial rites of baptism and Eucharist. My
Christian Platonist convictions persuade me that everything around us is
sacramental, in the sense that everything God has created both points to him
and makes him present. Robin Parry, in his recent book The Biblical Cosmos,
makes exactly this point, arguing that for the Old Testament everything in creation
is in some way sacramental.” (p1)
Everything participates in God’s life (p1)
“To be sure, we need to make a distinction between such “general”
sacramentality and the sacraments of the church.” (p2) – cf. general and
special revelation, nature and grace, church and the world
Note 2, p2, possible objection: “if everything is a
sacrament, then nothing is a sacrament.” – distinction not separation,
centrality of grace through church, Eucharist
“Saint Augustine uses the term [sacrament] to describe
liturgical feasts (such as Easter and Pentecost), ecclesial rites (including
exorcisms and penance), worship activities (singing, reading, prayer, the sign
of the cross, bowing of the head), and objects used in church (such as penitential
garments, the font, and salt). [Cutrone, “Sacraments”, p742]. Moreover, he regularly
refers to scriptural texts as sacramenta, much as I will do throughout this
book. [Dodara, Christ and the Just
Society, 147-59]
Baptism and Supper still unique
“the early church’s fluidity with regard to the term “sacrament”
is helpful in reminding us that God uses not only baptism and Eucharist but
also many other activities, rites, objects, people, and celebrations to fill
the church’s saints with grace. It wouldn’t seem out of place, therefore, to
add to Augustine’s list of ecclesial sacraments the Scriptures themselves. Holy
Scripture too is a sacrament, in as much as it renders Christ present to us”
(p2)
“I usually refer to this Christian Platonist understanding
of reality [a participatory view of the relationship between nature and the supernatural
or between visible and invisible things] as “sacramental ontology,” by which I
mean that eternal realities are really present in visible things.” (p12)
“… we can see this sacramental ontology at work in
patristic biblical interpretation. My main argument… will be that patristic
exegesis treated the letter of the Old Testament text (what Origen called the manifesta, and what in sacramental
language we may call the sacramentum)
as containing the treasure of a “hidden” meaning (the occulta mentioned above, or the reality or res in sacramental discourse), which one can discover in and
through God’s salvific self-revelation in Jesus Christ.” (p12)
“This book will make clear that the church fathers were
convinced of a close (participatory) link between this-worldly sacrament (sacramentum) and otherworldly reality (res). For the church fathers, the hidden
presence of the reality was finally revealed as the fullness of time, in the
Christ event – along with everything that this event entails: Christ’s own
person and work; the church’s origin; the believers’ new, Spirit-filled lives
in Christ; and the eschatological renewal of all things in and through Christ. The
church fathers saw this entire new-covenant reality as the hidden treasure
already present in the Old Testament. In other words, the reason the church
fathers practiced typology, allegory, and so on is that they were convinced
that the reality of the Christ event was already present (sacramentally) within
the history described within the Old Testament narrative. To speak of a
sacramental hermeneutic, therefore, is to allude to the recognition of the real
presence of the new Christ-reality hidden within the outward sacrament of the
biblical text.” (p12)
No comments:
Post a Comment