Conservative evangelicals are convinced from the
Scriptures and tradition and reason and experience, or so we claim, that same-sex
sexual relationships are wrong.
But, one might say, is there not much in such
relationships to celebrate and thank God for? Must we not distinguish? As with
a heterosexual relationship, could we not ask for God’s blessing on all that is
good in the relationship without condoning anything that is bad?
One approach might be to reject the premise of the
question and claim that there is nothing good in same-sex sexual relationships.
But this will not do. Or at least not in a way. Clearly same sex sexual
relationships contain much that is good: love, kindness, mutual help,
faithfulness and so on. Some are wonderfully moving and inspiring examples
which put many heterosexual marriages to shame.
But moral actions are not only to be evaluated piecemeal
and in the abstract. They must be taken as a whole and concretely too.
We must say that all that is proper only to a marriage
which is found in a same-sex sexual relationship, however laudable it would be
in a marriage, is out of place and misdirected in a same sex sexual relationship.
Allow me an analogy. Now, I know this is dangerous. The
headline writers just love “Vicar compares homosexual marriage to X” but I hope
you will see the very specific point I want to make.
Consider a bank robbery. Is there not much in it that is
good and commendable? A man wants to provide for his children. He co-operates
wonderfully with his friends to whom he is politeness itself. He has the most
fantastic skill as a safe-breaker. Does it make sense to celebrate those
things? Yes and no. Are they goods? Or could they be goods? Yes. But they are
misdirected and out of place in a bank robbery. Do they make the bank robbery
good? No. Could one bless the bank robbery? I don’t think so. Not on these
grounds at least.
If a case is to be made for the blessing of same-sex
relationships, it is not this one.
No comments:
Post a Comment