tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20918615.post114880079454710755..comments2024-03-14T20:03:37.044+00:00Comments on Sussex Parson: Marc Lloyd's 'Miscellanies': Please evangelise me better!Marc Lloydhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12532904022047805067noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20918615.post-1148893468597144312006-05-29T10:04:00.000+01:002006-05-29T10:04:00.000+01:00Slander is spoken/broadcast; libel is written/prin...Slander is spoken/broadcast; libel is written/printed. You forgot 'Reformed'!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20918615.post-1148836247966780962006-05-28T18:10:00.000+01:002006-05-28T18:10:00.000+01:00Yes, that's right. Exactly as I said above, don't ...Yes, that's right. Exactly as I said above, don't you think? <BR/><BR/>I'm sure I, we, Chris and all discerning readers of this blog will realise that Neil Jeffers is a (proper) Conservative Evangelical orthodox believer type, in no way a Buddhist, Hindu or Multi-faith masher and a thoroughly good thing. <BR/><BR/>No slander intended! <BR/><BR/>Hope that's all alright with the lawyers.<BR/><BR/>When is slander, libel, by the way?Marc Lloydhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12532904022047805067noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20918615.post-1148830301941530942006-05-28T16:31:00.000+01:002006-05-28T16:31:00.000+01:00I think I've remembered it. Having made the point ...I think I've remembered it. Having made the point that Christianity was unique among world religions because of the divine claims of Jesus, Chris responded that every religion thought it was unique, which therefore means Christianity isn't unique at all. I suggested that Hindhuism and Buddhism didn't necessarily see themselves as unique in that sense, thinking they were more accurate but that others also had truth. I hope I made clear that they are WRONG, and Christ remains unique in history.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20918615.post-1148818965376853732006-05-28T13:22:00.000+01:002006-05-28T13:22:00.000+01:00No, I'm pretty sure it was you and that you said t...No, I'm pretty sure it was you and that you said that sort of thing: purely for educational purposes and to aid Chris' understanding of what other people were saying in the conversation, that is. I should add that I thought you gave a true and accurate summary of what some people think.Marc Lloydhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12532904022047805067noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20918615.post-1148818329257618352006-05-28T13:12:00.000+01:002006-05-28T13:12:00.000+01:00When did I say that? Slanderous comments! Are you ...When did I say that? Slanderous comments! Are you sure you haven't confused me with someone else?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com